Tuesday 17 February 2015

How do you evaluate talent

I had an opportunity recently to attend a session host by Compugen Inc., a leading IT Service provider in Canada. put on by Jamie Scarborough, Founding Partner, Sales Talent Agency. The guest speaker was Jamie Scarborough, Founding Partner, Sales Talent Agency. In the session, we all agreed that people are and will always be the real and most important asset for any organization that seeks sustainable growth.





Jamie shared how his company evaluates talent which can be categorized from two perspectives: Talent and Experience. He summarized the concept of three letters – DNA when evaluating people from a talent perspective. 
  1. Drive – Goal-oriented and resilient.
  2. Nature – emotional intelligence. How well candidates can fit into the existing environment.
  3. Acumen – business acumen. i.e. whether a sales candidate can make a profitable sale. Rather than sell a product directly. Candidates can sell a valued solution to customers from which they will earn a higher gross margin. This is the so-called “solution selling”. 

From an experience perspective, Jamie utilized the acronym “PRO” to select the right people.
  1. Performance history – whether the candidates had a proven track record in the past.
  2. Relevancy – Whether the candidates have similar work experience.
  3. Opportunity – opportunity management.

As for opportunity management, Jamie gave a 3-year talent benchmark that an employee should stay with a company for at least three consecutive years. In the first year, an employee needs to adapt to the new environment, learn the corporate culture and build positive relationships with colleagues. In the second year, they become familiar with the company processes and start to make a profit. In general, people make reasonably good profits in the third year. If an employee leaves a company within 3 years, the company is at a loss, given the training and resources that allocated to the employee.

On the other hand, how a company can attract talented people? In my opinion, a company should create an open environment and offer the following:
  • Executive support.
  • Allow mistakes – trial and experiment to identify the optimal methods for a chosen project.
  • Buy-in/positive reinforcement from key stakeholders.



Tuesday 10 February 2015

Can Xiaomi smartphone business model last?

Xiaomi is now the world’s third largest smartphone producer, followed by Lenovo and LG according to IDCSamsung remains in first place, followed by Apple Inc. Xiaomi passed Apple and Samsung to become the best-selling smartphone provider in China in the second quarter of 2014, according to Canalys a research firm. Xiaomi sold 61.1 million phones representing approximately $12 billion in revenue in 2014.




As the CEO of Xiaomi, Lei Jun summarized its successful model in  the following three main areas:

1. Hardware assembly: all components are of superior quality. For example, the chip is produced by highly regarded QualcommThe screen is from Sharp and the smartphones are assembled through Foxconnthe same assembler that builds for Apple smartphones. The quality of Mi phone is equivalent to that of Apple or Samsung smartphones.

2. Customers/Fans deep involvement: for example, when Xiaomi developed its operating system, it listened to the requirements from its fans and took the feedback seriously, including same  in the actual development process. 

3. The price is cheaper. Xiaomi smartphones are sold online in order to reduce distribution costs. The gross profit is very low. The selling price is close to its cost generating a modest margin. Xiaomi makes money through volume sold.  


The combination of the three areas is the so-called Xiaomi smartphone business model. Is this business model sustainable? Let’s compare it with Apple’s business model. For any product, it should follow the 6+1 industrial chains including the following six areas plus manufacturing:

1. Product design 
2. Raw material purchase 
3. Inventory and shipping 
4. Order management 
5. Wholesale    
6. Retail sale

The profit from manufacturing is very low, as we all know. The real profit lies in the 6 areas. Apple takes control of all 6 areas, but outsources manufacturing to Foxconn. In contrast, Xiaomi does not control product design. It is the origin of all kinds of problems. If you have used a Mi phone, you know it constantly has the problems such as crashing, overheating, camera giving off a red image and a periodic echo. The phone operates slower and slower over time and therefore you have to buy a new one every year. 

According to a market research, people who really like Mi phone only accounts for 23% of the users. But those who like Samsung or Apple smartphones account for 80%+. The main reason is because of bad user experience emanating from poor product design. 

Smartphone success is not as simple as assembling components. In my opinion, in order to succeed in the manufacturing field, a company must control all 6 of the industrial chains. Lack of any component will cause problems in the long run.

If you are interested in Xiaomi smartphone business model, you can click here to view what Hugo BarraVice President of Xiaomi Global said about it.